##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

The overall objective of the paper is to examine how states that face an overarching (perceived) existential threat may be at a disadvantage when developing their National Security Strategies (NSS). The main hypothesis is that states facing an overarching threat tend to focus almost exclusively on that and may subsequently ignore or under-estimate other potential great threats, while at the same time they may miss out on opportunities to enhance their domestic, and even regional, security and geopolitical standing. A secondary hypothesis aims to test whether these myopic situations develop due to the sociopolitical expectations for a single-issue NSS focus. Furthermore, being an EU Member State may potentially exacerbate a false sense of both insecurity (from the overarching threat) and security (from other potential threats). This raises questions on i) whether the EU is in a position to understand the localized security perceptions and thus provide the necessary support to mitigate those fears, and ii) whether it can act as a security provider, not only in real terms (point i), but also by re-orienting the Member States’ view of security and threats.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

National Security Strategies (NSS), existential threats, EU Member States, overarching threats, security

References
Adamides, C. (forthcoming) Securitization and Desecuritization Processes in Protracted Conflicts: The Case of Cyprus. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Adamides, C. and Kontos, M. (2018) ‘Greek Cypriots Perception of the UN’, in Cyprus Roadmap for Peace: A Critical Interrogation of the Conflict. eds Michael Michael and Vural Yucel. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publishing: 145-155.

Adamides, C. (2014) ‘Negative perceptions of foreign actors: an integral part of conflict perpetuating routines’. In M. Kontos, N. Panayiotides, H. Alexandrou, and S. C. Theodoulou (eds), Great
Power Politics in Cyprus: Foreign Interventions and Domestic Perceptions, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 197-222.

Adamides, C. (2015). ‘A comfortable and routine conflict’. In J. Ker Lindsay (ed.) Resolving Cyprus: New Approaches to Conflict Resolution. London: I.B. Tauris: 5–15.

Adamides, C. and Constantinou M. C. (2012) ‘Comfortable Conflict and (il)liberal peace in Cyprus’. In O. P. Richmond and A. Mitchell (eds), Hybrid Forms of Peace: From the 'Everyday' to Post-liberalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan: 242–259.

Alexseev, M. (2011) ‘Societal security, the security dilemma, and extreme anti-migrant hostility in Russia’. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 48, No. 4: 509–523.

Arsalidou, A. (2017, May 9) ‘EU participation the greatest guarantee for our own existence, Foreign Minister tells CAN’, Cyprus News Agency, available at http://media.cna.org.cy/WebNews-en.aspx?a=ed7bbaa5f24946258625cbc2b79fb426, accessed 3 July 2018.

Azar, E. (1983) ‘The Theory of Protracted Social Conflict and the Challenge of Transforming Conflict Situations’. In Dina A. Zinnes (ed), Conflict and the Breakdown of International Systems.
Denver, CO: University of Colorado.

Bartunek, R.-J. (2018) ‘EU’s Junker criticizes Turkey over ship incident’, Reuters (2018, 14 February), available at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyprus-natgas-turkey-eu/eusjuncker-
criticizes-turkey-over-ship-incident-idUSKCN1FY1OG.

Bigo, D. (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Government of Unease’. Alternatives. 27 (Special Issue): 53-92.

Bigo, D. (2005) ‘From Foreigners to “Abnormal Aliens”’. In E. Guild and J Van Selm (eds), International Migration and Security: Opportunities and Challenges, Abingdon, UK: Routledge:
64–81.

Boulding, K. (1989) Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Buzan, B. (2006) ‘Will the “global war on terrorism” be the new Cold War?’ International Affairs, Vol. 82 No. 6: 1101-1118.

Buzan B., Wæver O. and de Jaap, W. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Constantinou, C. (2008) ‘On the Cypriot States of Exception’. International Political Sociology Vol. 2, No. 2: 145-164.

Diehl, P.F. and Goertz, G. (2000) War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Diez, T. (2002) ‘Last exit to paradise? The European Union, the Cyprus conflict and the problematic “catalytic effect”’. In Thomas Diez (ed.), The European Union and the Cyprus Conflict: Modern conflict, postmodern union. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 139–162.

European Parliament, (2017) ‘Parliamentary Questions, Answers given to Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission’. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2017-006622&language=EN.

European Union, (n.d.) ‘A Global Strategy to Promote Citizens’ Interests’, available at http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/global-strategy-foreign-and-security-policy-european-union.

Friedman, G. (1999) ‘Conceptualizing Protracted Conflict and Protracted Conflict Management.’ In Harvey Starr (ed), The Understanding and Management of Global Violence: New Approaches
To Theory and Research on Protracted Conflict. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press: 35-69.

Floyd, R. (2007) ‘Human security and the Copenhagen School’s securitization approach: Conceptualizing human security as a securitization move’. Human Security Journal, Vol. 5
(Winter): 38–49.

Guzzini, S. (2011) ‘Securitization as a causal mechanism’. Security Dialogue, Vol. 42, No.5: 329-341.

Hansen, L. (2000) ‘The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School’. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2: 285–306.

Hitchens, C. (1984) Cyprus. NY, NY: Quartet Books.

Horowitz, L. D. (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkley: University of California Press.

Jahn, D. and Storsved, A. S. (1995) ‘Legitimacy through referendum? The nearly successful domino-strategy of the EU-referendums in Austria, Finland, Sweden and Norway’. West European Politics. Vol. 18, No. 4: 18-37.

Kriesberg, L. (1998) Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Mitzen, J. (2006) ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 12, No. 3: 341-370.

Papadakis, Y., Peristianis, N., and Welz, G. (2006) ‘Modernity, History and Conflict in Divided Cyprus: An Oveview’. In Y. Papadakis, N. Peristianis, and G. Welz (eds), Divided Cyprus: Modernity, History and an Island in Conflict. Indianapolis: Indiana University: 1–29.

Richmond, O. P. (2002) ‘The multiple dimensions of international peacemaking: UN and EU involvement in the Cyprus conflict’. In T. Diez (ed.), The European Union and the Cyprus
Conflict, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Sommers, M. (2002) Children, education and war: reaching Education for All (EFA) objectives in countries affected by conflict. Social development papers. Conflict prevention and reconstruction series; CPR no. 1. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Tyler, T.R. (2001) ‘A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities’. In J. T. Jost and B. Major (eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology,
Justice and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wæver, O. (2011) ‘Politics, security, theory’, Security Dialogue, Vol. 42, No. 4-5: 465-480.

Wishnick, E (2010) ‘Dilemmas of securitization and health risk management in the People’s Republic of China: The cases of SARS and avian influenza’, Health Policy and Planning, Vol.
25, No. 6: 454–466.

Opinion polls and reports

Eurobarometer 2017. Special Eurobarometer 464b. Europeans’ attitudes towards security. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion. [accessed January 23,
2018].

Georgia, National Security Concept of Georgia. Available at: https://mod.gov.ge/en/page/70/national-security-concept-of-georgia. [accessed May 19, 2018].

Georgia, Public Attitudes- in Georgia. 2018. Survey conducted by CRRC, Georgia. Available at: https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/NDI_March_2018_Public%20Presentation_
English_final.pdf. [accessed May 19, 2018].

Global Terrorism Database. Available at: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ [accessed on April 20, 2018].

SEED, Center for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development, 2017.

The Security Dialogue Initiative for Cyprus: Interim Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. Available at: https://www.interpeace.org/2017/06/innovative-security-approach/. [accessed on April 23, 2018].
Section
Articles